Matching transactions using formulas [Accounting]

Posted on June 6th, 2014 in Excel Howtos , Learn Excel - 19 comments

Imagine you are the head of Accounts Receivable department at a large company. Drab, I know, But humor me and imagine.

Now, every month you get a transaction report like this:

Example Transactions - Matching them using formulas

And you want to know which numbers are matching up.

i.e, if your company gave Vendor-0002 $872.34 on 1st of April, 2014 and your received below payments from them subsequently,

  • $427.77 on 1st April
  • $152.88 on 2nd April
  • $291.69 on 2nd April

Then you consider the account matched since the total received is same as total payable.(427.77 + 152.88 + 291.69 = 872.34).

Matching transactions (reconciling) using Excel formulas

Manually identifying all such matching transactions can be tedious, boring & error-prone.

This is where formulas come handy.

Using simple Excel formulas, we can identify all matching transactions, highlight them using conditional formatting so that you can chase the vendors with an outstanding.

Note: thanks to Kirstin whose email question prompted me to write this article.

Using formulas to match up (reconcile) accounting transactions

Step 1: Lets take a look at the data

This is how our AR (Accounts Receivable) data looks above (very first image in this post).

For the sake of simplicity I have set up this data as an Excel table.

Step 2: Write the formula

Here is the criteria for matching.

  • If the total amounts (paid & received) corresponding to a vendor is zero, we consider it matched.
  • Else not.

Add an extra column to the table and write this formula.

=ROUND(SUMIFS([Amount],[Vendor Reference],[@[Vendor Reference]]),2)=0

What this formula does:

It gives TRUE if a particular vendor’s amounts to total to ZERO

else FALSE

How it works?

The SUMIFS formula sums up all the numbers for the vendor name in current row [@[Vendor Reference]]

The ROUND formula rounds it to 2 digit precision. We need to use this because of a floating point error in Excel (that returns extremely small values when the result should be zero).

Related: How to use structural references in Excel

Step 3: Fill down the formula

Fortunately, you don’t have to do this step. Excel automatically fills the formula down as we are using tables. Yay!

Step 4: Highlight matched rows using conditional formatting.

Make a note of the column where TRUE / FALSE values are calculated. In my set-up, it is column E.

Select the entire table. Go to conditional formatting > new rule from home ribbon.

Set up a rule like this:

Conditional formatting rule for highlighting matched transactions

Note the mixed reference style $E4. This ensures that for highlighting all columns, Excel checks only column E.

That is all. You have now matched all the paid-up transactions. Time to flex your muscles, put-up your legs on the desk and call those other people who did not pay yet.

Matching transactions using Excel formulas & conditional formatting - final

Download example workbook

Click here to download example workbook & practice. Examine formulas & conditional formatting to learn more.

How do you reconcile / match-up transactions?

I will be honest. I have never been the head of accounts receivable department. Even in my own household, I do not handle receivables. My wife takes care of that. I handle payables (ie credit card bills, shopping expenses and other such things).

But I often use formulas to reconcile my bank statement.

What about you? Do you use formulas to match transactions. What techniques you rely on? Please share your tips & ideas using comments.

Bonus homework

Assuming we have data like above, what formula answers the question:

How many vendors have their transactions matched?

Post your formulas in comments.

 

Your email address is safe with us. Our policies

Written by Chandoo
Tags: , , , , , , ,
Home: Chandoo.org Main Page
? Doubt: Ask an Excel Question

19 Responses to “Matching transactions using formulas [Accounting]”

  1. Utkarsh Shah says:

    I will use pivot table for above example. After pivot just use round formula to sum of amount.

  2. GFC says:

    =ROWS(Table1[Matched?])-SUMPRODUCT(Table1[Matched?]*1)

  3. Elias says:

    18 vendors have their transactions matched.

    =SUMPRODUCT(Table1[Matched?]/COUNTIF(Table1[Vendor Reference],Table1[Vendor Reference]))

    Regards

  4. GFC says:

    The total of an additional helper column
    =IF([@[Vendor Reference]]=OFFSET([@[Vendor Reference]];-1;0);0;[@[Matched?]]*1)

  5. Heather says:

    I agree with Utkarsh – a pivot table is likely the fastest way to handle it using this example.

    Personally I create a unique table of vendors, and then use SUMIFS formulas to bring in both the expenses and the payments into separate columns (because my ledger includes a description of type of transaction).

    So my formula for invoices is more like =SUMIFS(Table1[Amount],Table1[Vendor Reference],[@[Vendor]],Table1[Transaction Type],”Invoice”)

    And then there is a formula to pull the Payments in the next column

    Fourth column (because the first column is the vendor name) is for difference between Invoice and Payment.

  6. Jorge Supelano says:

    Another approach is to insert a new column with the following formula in C5:

    =IF(AND(C4[@[Vendor Reference]],[@[Matched?]]=TRUE),1,0), then sum the total at the end of that column

  7. Herbert says:

    The sum of the additional helper column
    =IF([@[Matched?]]=TRUE, 1/ COUNTIF([Vendor Reference], “=”&[@[Vendor Reference]]), 0)

  8. Leah says:

    I would also use a pivot table to solve this… But, great formula!

  9. Nice formulas to everybody! but no offense, just a modest comment:

    “Simplicity is Elegance” like Albert Einstein said.

    I would use a Pivot Table too!

    • Chandoo says:

      I agree. A pivot table would be really simple & quick way to solve this problem.

      • Leah says:

        On second thought, there are occasions where you would want to delete or move the data that is zeroed out. To my knowledge, this cannot be done with a pivot table. Therefore, the formula approach would be MUCH better as you can then sort by the TRUE responses and move, delete, copy, edit, color, etc. the data. I have a worksheet where I do exactly that and I have changed it to include the formulas you suggest in this article! Thank you!

  10. Kerry says:

    I would also favor a pivot table. But thank you for the formula and conditional formatting example. I’m trying to learn more formulas because most of my coworkers do not like to use pivots and my boss usually likes to see the detail and how I got there from the raw data.

  11. Chandoo, Interesting. I have never seen the @function used in a formula like that.
    @[Vendor Reference. What exactly is the @ doing in the formula? Is it calling the entire column?
    Thanks.
    Patricia

  12. Yore says:

    Create 1 helper column, populate all cells with the following formula, from cell F4 all the way to F261, assuming the data begin in cell B4,
    =COUNTIFS(C4:C25,Table1[@[Vendor Reference]],E4:E25,TRUE)

    - another cell, say G4, with this formula
    =COUNTIF($G$4:$G$261,1)

  13. Elen says:

    Hi! I would favor the formulas, as I have hundreds of vendors, it would be harder to anilyze this by pivot, with formulas I have the possibility to filter and include the document number also, as it is important to me.
    I’ve been listening for 10 minutes (YouTube) and then realized – vendors do not pay us, customers do, we pay vendors:)
    Also the mistake with the round up in the pivot be solved if we add another column in the initial data table and ask it to round up and use it for the sum in pivot. In this case we would not need to filter with 0,01. I know this is an additional step, but sometimes it is harder to explain why a person needs to filter not by zero, if you send the file to somebody. Also in this case if we filter excluding the zeros we will be able to see the negative amounts, for my country this will be also valid, as we are obliged to return overpayments by law.
    Thank you for showing it!

  14. Gorden says:

    This is a great formula. I love the way it must include the same vendor in order for the calculation to work.

    How would I rewrite the formula if I had to include the same vendor, and exact DATE to match to produce a “true” result, otherwise anyhting else would be false?

    Thank you,
    Gorden

Leave a Reply