Can you imagine building a complex worksheet without formulas? I can’t. While no one can dispute the usability of formulas, we all know how painful it is when an excel formula returns a mysterious error and we don’t know what is causing it.
When I learned IF() formula for the first time, I have spent a whole Sunday morning debugging a stupid error in a grade calculation formula.
So as part of our spreadcheats series, we will learn a handy trick you can use to debug formulas and fix the errors quickly.
Assuming we have a moderately lengthy formula like this
=IF(AVERAGE(B2:B6)<=AVERAGE(C2:C6),MAX(B2:B6),MAX(C2:C6))
and we want to know where the error is occurring
- Select the cell with formula.
- Now click on the formula bar
- Just select the parts the formula and press F9 (for eg: the first average() formula)
- This will evaluate only the selected part and replaces it with the result. Like this:
- Using this technique you can narrow down the errors to particular range or values causing it.
- Now that you know where the error is occurring you can wrap that part of formula with an ISERROR() formula to avoid unpleasant surprises.
What is your favorite way of handling errors?
PS: If you have mailed me or commented here and waiting for a response, please give me some more time. I am having trouble getting internet connection in Chennai and visiting browsing center to respond to mails is not a pleasant experience either. I really appreciate your patience. Meanwhile if you know any free wi-fi hot spots in Chennai do let me know through comments. 🙂
9 Responses to “Show forecast values in a different color with this simple trick [charting]”
While this works in a pinch, it clearly "lightens" the colors of the entire chart. Depending on where you use this, it will be blatantly obvious that you don't know what you are doing and present a poor looking graph.
Why not separate the data into different segments when charting and have as many colors as you have data points? You might have to create a new legend and/or repeat the chart in "invisible ink", but it would be cleaner and more consistent when new or updated data becomes available.
While I think I agree that doing it "properly" via a second series is preferable, I don't necessarily agree that making the entirety of the "future" (data, gridlines, and even the axis) semi-transparent is "poor looking". I think it could be seen as adding more emphasis to the "future-ness" of the forecast data.
In short, it's another tool for the toolbox, even if it's never needed.
Simply and clever 🙂
Quick & effective, cool. thanks.
I always use the dummy series.
Nice little trick, thanks very much!
Two sets of data better. Control is much better.
You can use the same chart next month to see what is actual and what is forecast.
To use this trick, I think grid lines has to be removed, that will make the graphic much more sharp.
to be honest, i dont understand why there is needed to do this way... in this case horizontal lines will be pale as well. then why a just can't change the color of the line partly???
Great tutorial. Thanks for the tutorial!