Van Gysel asked in a recent post at Chandoo.org for a way to calculate the costs of running a plantation. The twist is that the costs vary by year, and based on the age of the trees.
The following is a slightly simplified version of the solution I offered:
=SUM(IFERROR(LOOKUP(“Year”&MMULT(N($B$3:B$7>0),TRANSPOSE(COLUMN($B$3:B$7)^0)), $B$11:$I$11, $B12:$I12),0)*B$3:B$7) Ctrl+Shift+Enter
Today I am going to try and explain how the formula works.
As always at Formula Forensics, you can follow along with a sample file: Download Here
The Problem
In a plantation, the costs for planting and maintaining trees vary based on the age of the trees and by year. The table below shows the acres of trees planted per year and the yield and costs per year that vary based on the age of the trees.

Let us look at the calculations needed for each year.
Year 2013
- 300 acres of trees were planted in 2013. Calculations for 2013 are as follows. (Only Yield calculation is shown, but the process is similar for Nursery costs, Fertilizers, etc.)
- The trees do not yield any fruits in the first year. As such, Yield for year1=300*0=0
That was easy!
Year 2014
- 700 additional acres of trees will be planted in 2014. Calculations for 2014 are as follows. (Again, only Yield calculation is shown, but others are calculated similarly.)
- 300 acres of trees are 2 years old. 700 acres are 1 year old.
- The 300 acres from 2013 now yield fruit since it is year2. However, the new trees (700 acres) do not yield any fruits yet. So total yield for 2014=300*Year2Yield+700*Year1Yield=300*5+700*0
Year 2015
- 1000 additional acres are to be planted in 2015. Calculations for 2015 are as follows:
- 300 acres are from 2013 (3 years old); 700 acres are from 2014 (2 years old); 1000 acres are from 2015 (1 year old).
- Yield for 2015=300*Year3Yield + 700*Year2Yield + 1000*Year1Yield = 300*10 + 700*5 + 1000*0
Year 2016
- 1000 additional acres are to be planted in 2016. Calculations for 2016 are as follows:
- Yield for 2016=300*15+700*10+1000*5+1000*0
How do we simulate the above calculation in an Excel formula?
A Solution
Let us first look at how we performed the calculations above manually, using the 2016 Yield as an example.
- We took each acreage value in 2016, and determined its age by counting how many years it has been since that acreage was planted. You might have observed that the age can be counted by the number of times a value has been repeated up to that point. (In other words, if I planted 300 acres in 2013, I should see that same amount in 2014, 2015 and 2016.) As such, 300 acres is repeated 4 times. 700 acres is repeated 3 times. 1000 acres is repeated 2 times. And the latest planting of 1000 acres exists only once.
- Once we determine the age for a given acreage, we looked up the yield for that age in the second table
- We then multiplied the acreage with the corresponding yield value.
Calculation #1 can be expressed as follows:
- Age for acreage 1 (first planted in 2013)=count of B3:E3 where value is greater than zero. i.e. COUNTIF(B3:E3,”>0”)
- Age for acreage 2 (planted in 2014)=count of B4:E4 where value is greater than zero. i.e. COUNTIF(B4:E4,”>0”)
- Age for acreage 3 (planted in 2015)=count of B5:E5 where value is greater than zero. i.e. COUNTIF(B5:E5,”>0”)
- Age for acreage 4 (planted in 2016)=count of B6:E6 where value is greater than zero. i.e. COUNTIF(B6:E6,”>0”)
- Age for acreage 5 is zero since nothing has been planted for 2017 yet in 2016
The above approach would work if we were calculating the age one row at a time. However, that can become tedious really fast. We need to perform the calculation for the full range (B3:E7) together, but return the counts for each row individually.
Excel’s MMULT function comes to the rescue!
MMULT (which stands for Matrix Multiply) multiplies two matrices and returns a third matrix based on rules for matrix multiplication. I am planning to devote a whole article to explain the MMULT function. As such, for this article, we will summarize the utility of the function as “take a 2-dimensional array, add each column’s value for each row, and return a 1-column array”.
MMULT requires that its arguments be numeric.
So to obtain the counts for the year 2016, we can use the following:
MMULT(N($B$3:E$7>0),TRANSPOSE(COLUMN($B$3:E$7)^0))
As you can see from the picture below, MMULT’s results are the addition of each column for each row.
In the above formula, you may have noticed that the range uses absolute and relative referencing (signified by the $ sign or lack thereof). This is to ensure that the range grows or shrinks as needed. The upper left address is held constant ($B$3). However, the lower right address for the range has columns that vary but row that is fixed on row #7. This ensures that the formula would work if we copy to the left, right, etc. in the final results.
Now that we have the age for each acreage value, we can look up the corresponding yield value using (what else?) LOOKUP function.
But before we can use LOOKUP, we will need to convert the numeric values returned from MMULT into the strings Year1, Year2, etc. found in the Costs table. Of course, you know how to do that… concatenate the string “Year” to the result from MMULT
“Year”&MMULT(N($B$3:E$7>0),TRANSPOSE(COLUMN($B$3:E$7)^0))
For the 2016 example, we get {“Year4″;”Year3″;”Year2″;”Year1″;”Year0”}
We can now use LOOKUP as follows:
LOOKUP(“Year”&MMULT(N($B$3:E$7>0),TRANSPOSE(COLUMN($B$3:E$7)^0)), $B$11:$I$11, $B12:$I12)
You may recall that LOOKUP looks up a value in the array indicated by the second argument, and returns the corresponding value from the third array argument. In this case, instead of looking up a single value, we look up an array of values (supplied in the first argument) to the function.
The above formula translates to the following:
LOOKUP({“Year4″;”Year3″;”Year2″;”Year1″;”Year0”}, {“Year1″,”Year2″,”Year3″,”Year4″,”Year5″,”Year6″,”Year7″,”Year8”}, {0,5,10,15,20,25,30,35})
The result from LOOKUP is {15;10;5;0;#N/A}
(The last value is #N/A because there is no acreage value for 2017 yet (as of 2016 column). The concatenation resulted in Year0 which does not exist in the “Age of The Trees” range (B11:I11) above.)
By using IFERROR(LOOKUP(…),0) we get {15;10;5;0;0}
We can now multiply the above result with the acreage values for 2016 to get {4500;7000;5000;0;0}
Finally, we SUM the values to get 16500
Putting it all together, we get the following formula (shown for Production for year 2016)
=SUM(IFERROR(LOOKUP(“Year”&MMULT(N($B$3:E$7>0),TRANSPOSE(COLUMN($B$3:E$7)^0)), $B$11:$I$11, $B12:$I12),0)*E$3:E$7)
One of the benefits of the above formula is that you can copy the same formula to calculate values for additional years, as well as other plantation costs.
Download
You can download a copy of the above file and follow along: Download sample file.
Let me know (using the comments below) what you think of the above approach and solution, as well as any other approaches you have utilized to solve a similar problem. In the meantime, I wish you continued Excellence!
-Sajan.
Other Posts in this Series
The Formula Forensics Series contains a wealth of useful solutions and information.
Visit the Formula Forensics Home Page to read other articles in this series.



















17 Responses to “Budget vs. Actual Profit Loss Report using Pivot Tables”
Good Work, Yogesh & Chandoo! Thanks.
Hi everybody,
first sorry I am late to say something about this topic;actually I was waiting last part
second I am not accountant I am an Engineer
third """"Very Important""" the idea is not about Loss but I am sure it is profit
Based on third it shows:
1- How to use EXCEL
2- How to use pivot TABLES
3- How to collect and arrange DATA
4- How to make reports
Many Thanks
Hi Yogesh and Chandoo,
Thank you for sharing your knowledge!
You guys are great!
thanks chandoo and yogesh, thanks for you lessons, are great!....i have a idea for a budget. I try to do it..... thanks for all
Thanks a lot for sharing the most powerful tool worldwide "knowledge"
Warm greetings from Peru
Hi -
This is a really great article because it's a simple and common thing you'd want to do with a pivot table but not at all obvious how to do it! So - muchas gracias to Chandoo and Yogesh!
One thing - I couldn't get past the group error in the sample file. I would click on ungroup but it didn't seem to have any effect. I'd appreciate it if anybody has any pointers here.
-Juanito
Hi Chandoo
I am also having the group error. Can't seem to ungroup? Appreciate if you explain further on the steps required in order to get to calculated items.
Many thanks and keep up the great work.
Cheers
Adam
Hi Chandoo,
I'm struggling resolving the problem depicted below:
I have a set of data, with (among others) a "Region" field (can be APJ, EMEA, or AMS), and a "Country" field.
Unfortunately, I need to group data by the following 4 Regions: APeJ, Japan, EMEA and AMS.
I first tried to make a pivot with Region and Country in the rows (or columns), and then group Country data as per the above.
Alas, as soon as I have a new Country that appear in my data set, my groupings are broken, and I have to redo the job of ungrouping, grouping etc.
I thought I could try to use calculated item, by adding first a new column to my dataset concatenating Region_Country, and create an "APeJ" calculated item that would sum all the "APJ_*" and substract the "APJ_Japan", but again, no clue, as I can't find a way to use any wild card in those formulas.
Given that I already found extremely helpful tips and tricks in your site that helped me manage that bunch of data, I'm pretty sure you'll have a bright idea on how I can solve that one!
Thanks in advance for your lights!
Hi Catherine...
In such cases, I advice using an additional column in the data itself. You can set-up a grouping table else where with country in first column, region in second column. And then in the data, you can add an extra column and use VLOOKUP to fetch the region based on the country.
Then feed this entire data (with extra column) to pivot table and use the extra column to group the data.
Hi Chandoo,
Thank you for your prompt answer.
I finally came to the same conclusion - after a rest 🙂 . I was probably too tired Friday evening (it was rather late), having spent hours in manipulating all my surveys data so as to pull rolling averages, make nice graphs and so on, and was trying to find a complex solution when there was a simple one.
Thanks again,
Catherine
Hey,
Great post!
I for example have different database structure with the following fields :
Date, Expense, Income, Sum (Income - Expense), Category (Sales, Cost of Goods and etc).
Creating a P&L report for the whole year works great. Including gross margin % and etc.
Though, creating P&L report by QTR/Month is becoming impossible since i get the following error : “This PivotTable report field is grouped. You cannot add calculated item to grouped filed.”
Is there a solution for this kind of problem?
Like Adam and Juanito, I also cannot ungroup.
Would appreciate it if you can add a few more lines and a screenshot or two on where to put the mouse cursor to ungroup.
Hi, I have figured out the ungrouping problem. One of the earlier steps was to group by month, if you pull the month back down to the column then right click and then select ungroup, then pull the month back up so you end up with just data source and budget/actual as the headings, then you can continue on.
To solve the ungroup problem, my method is:
Copy the "data" sheet to a whole new Excel workbook
and directly work on Part 6.
And since it is a fresh copy, Excel don't show me the "can't ungroup" problem. Hope this help.
Thank you Yogesh for this wonderful tutorial.
Kent, Malaysia
Just when i thought pivots were awesome i learn about inserting the calculated fields and that makes them more awesome. chandoo where have you been all my life.
Hello - your P&L pivot version has really impressed my boss and would like to use it. I have applied it for a actual vs budget vs forecast model I have created. One problem. In your variance above the operating profit percent % variance shows 33.8% but I want it to show (0.01) point or the true diff from prior budget.
I know I can add calculation to the side but boss would like to see it in pivot table.
Please help
Thanks
I have a further query which may solve my above dilemma. Is it possible to add a column that calculates percent increase. So in the example above a new column would be added to show variance %.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks