Formula Forensics-No. 036: Calculating Costs that Vary by Year and Age

Share

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Van Gysel asked in a recent post at Chandoo.org for a way to calculate the costs of running a plantation.  The twist is that the costs vary by year, and based on the age of the trees.

The following is a slightly simplified version of the solution I offered:

=SUM(IFERROR(LOOKUP(“Year”&MMULT(N($B$3:B$7>0),TRANSPOSE(COLUMN($B$3:B$7)^0)), $B$11:$I$11, $B12:$I12),0)*B$3:B$7)      Ctrl+Shift+Enter

Today I am going to try and explain how the formula works.

As always at Formula Forensics, you can follow along with a sample file: Download Here

 

The Problem

In a plantation, the costs for planting and maintaining trees vary based on the age of the trees and by year.  The table below shows the acres of trees planted per year and the yield and costs per year that vary based on the age of the trees.

FF36-02

Let us look at the calculations needed for each year.

Year 2013

  • 300 acres of trees were planted in 2013.  Calculations for 2013 are as follows.  (Only Yield calculation is shown, but the process is similar for Nursery costs, Fertilizers, etc.)
  • The trees do not yield any fruits in the first year.  As such, Yield for year1=300*0=0

That was easy!

 Year 2014

  • 700 additional acres of trees will be planted in 2014.  Calculations for 2014 are as follows.  (Again, only Yield calculation is shown, but others are calculated similarly.)

FF36-Year2Calc

  • 300 acres of trees are 2 years old.  700 acres are 1 year old.
  • The 300 acres from 2013 now yield fruit since it is year2.  However, the new trees (700 acres) do not yield any fruits yet.  So total yield for 2014=300*Year2Yield+700*Year1Yield=300*5+700*0

Year 2015

  • 1000 additional acres are to be planted in 2015.  Calculations for 2015 are as follows:

FF36-Year3Calc

  • 300 acres are from 2013 (3 years old); 700 acres are from 2014 (2 years old); 1000 acres are from 2015 (1 year old).
  • Yield for 2015=300*Year3Yield + 700*Year2Yield + 1000*Year1Yield = 300*10 + 700*5 + 1000*0

 Year 2016

  • 1000 additional acres are to be planted in 2016.  Calculations for 2016 are as follows:

FF36-Year4Calc

  • Yield for 2016=300*15+700*10+1000*5+1000*0

How do we simulate the above calculation in an Excel formula?

A Solution

Let us first look at how we performed the calculations above manually, using the 2016 Yield as an example.

  1. We took each acreage value in 2016, and determined its age by counting how many years it has been since that acreage was planted.  You might have observed that the age can be counted by the number of times a value has been repeated up to that point.  (In other words, if I planted 300 acres in 2013, I should see that same amount in 2014, 2015 and 2016.) As such, 300 acres is repeated 4 times.  700 acres is repeated 3 times.  1000 acres is repeated 2 times. And the latest planting of 1000 acres exists only once.
  2. Once we determine the age for a given acreage, we looked up the yield for that age in the second table
  3. We then multiplied the acreage with the corresponding yield value.

Calculation #1 can be expressed as follows:

  • Age for acreage 1 (first planted in 2013)=count of B3:E3 where value is greater than zero.  i.e. COUNTIF(B3:E3,”>0”)
  • Age for acreage 2 (planted in 2014)=count of B4:E4 where value is greater than zero.  i.e. COUNTIF(B4:E4,”>0”)
  • Age for acreage 3 (planted in 2015)=count of B5:E5 where value is greater than zero.  i.e. COUNTIF(B5:E5,”>0”)
  • Age for acreage 4 (planted in 2016)=count of B6:E6 where value is greater than zero.  i.e. COUNTIF(B6:E6,”>0”)
  • Age for acreage 5 is zero since nothing has been planted for 2017 yet in 2016

The above approach would work if we were calculating the age one row at a time.  However, that can become tedious really fast.  We need to perform the calculation for the full range (B3:E7) together, but return the counts for each row individually.

Excel’s MMULT function comes to the rescue!

MMULT (which stands for Matrix Multiply) multiplies two matrices and returns a third matrix based on rules for matrix multiplication.  I am planning to devote a whole article to explain the MMULT function.  As such, for this article, we will summarize the utility of the function as “take a 2-dimensional array, add each column’s value for each row, and return a 1-column array”.

MMULT requires that its arguments be numeric.

So to obtain the counts for the year 2016, we can use the following:

MMULT(N($B$3:E$7>0),TRANSPOSE(COLUMN($B$3:E$7)^0))

As you can see from the picture below, MMULT’s results are the addition of each column for each row.

FF36-TRUE FALSE to1s 0s

In the above formula, you may have noticed that the range uses absolute and relative referencing (signified by the $ sign or lack thereof).  This is to ensure that the range grows or shrinks as needed.  The upper left address is held constant ($B$3).  However, the lower right address for the range has columns that vary but row that is fixed on row #7.  This ensures that the formula would work if we copy to the left, right, etc. in the final results.

Now that we have the age for each acreage value, we can look up the corresponding yield value using (what else?) LOOKUP function.

But before we can use LOOKUP, we will need to convert the numeric values returned from MMULT into the strings Year1, Year2, etc. found in the Costs table.  Of course, you know how to do that… concatenate the string “Year” to the result from MMULT

“Year”&MMULT(N($B$3:E$7>0),TRANSPOSE(COLUMN($B$3:E$7)^0))

For the 2016 example, we get {“Year4″;”Year3″;”Year2″;”Year1″;”Year0”}

We can now use LOOKUP as follows:

LOOKUP(“Year”&MMULT(N($B$3:E$7>0),TRANSPOSE(COLUMN($B$3:E$7)^0)), $B$11:$I$11, $B12:$I12)

FF36-2016 calc

You may recall that LOOKUP looks up a value in the array indicated by the second argument, and returns the corresponding value from the third array argument.  In this case, instead of looking up a single value, we look up an array of values (supplied in the first argument) to the function.

The above formula translates to the following:

LOOKUP({“Year4″;”Year3″;”Year2″;”Year1″;”Year0”}, {“Year1″,”Year2″,”Year3″,”Year4″,”Year5″,”Year6″,”Year7″,”Year8”}, {0,5,10,15,20,25,30,35})

The result from LOOKUP is {15;10;5;0;#N/A}

(The last value is #N/A because there is no acreage value for 2017 yet (as of 2016 column).  The concatenation resulted in Year0 which does not exist in the “Age of The Trees” range (B11:I11) above.)

By using IFERROR(LOOKUP(…),0) we get {15;10;5;0;0}

We can now multiply the above result with the acreage values for 2016 to get {4500;7000;5000;0;0}

Finally, we SUM the values to get 16500

FF36-Final Calc

Putting it all together, we get the following formula (shown for Production for year 2016)

=SUM(IFERROR(LOOKUP(“Year”&MMULT(N($B$3:E$7>0),TRANSPOSE(COLUMN($B$3:E$7)^0)), $B$11:$I$11, $B12:$I12),0)*E$3:E$7)

One of the benefits of the above formula is that you can copy the same formula to calculate values for additional years, as well as other plantation costs.

Download

You can download a copy of the above file and follow along: Download sample file.

 

Let me know (using the comments below) what you think of the above approach and solution, as well as any other approaches you have utilized to solve a similar problem.  In the meantime, I wish you continued Excellence!

-Sajan.

 

 Other Posts in this Series

The Formula Forensics Series contains a wealth of useful solutions and information.

Visit the Formula Forensics Home Page to read other articles in this series.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Share this tip with your colleagues

Excel and Power BI tips - Chandoo.org Newsletter

Get FREE Excel + Power BI Tips

Simple, fun and useful emails, once per week.

Learn & be awesome.

Welcome to Chandoo.org

Thank you so much for visiting. My aim is to make you awesome in Excel & Power BI. I do this by sharing videos, tips, examples and downloads on this website. There are more than 1,000 pages with all things Excel, Power BI, Dashboards & VBA here. Go ahead and spend few minutes to be AWESOME.

Read my storyFREE Excel tips book

Overall I learned a lot and I thought you did a great job of explaining how to do things. This will definitely elevate my reporting in the future.
Rebekah S
Reporting Analyst
Excel formula list - 100+ examples and howto guide for you

From simple to complex, there is a formula for every occasion. Check out the list now.

Calendars, invoices, trackers and much more. All free, fun and fantastic.

Advanced Pivot Table tricks

Power Query, Data model, DAX, Filters, Slicers, Conditional formats and beautiful charts. It's all here.

Still on fence about Power BI? In this getting started guide, learn what is Power BI, how to get it and how to create your first report from scratch.

24 Responses

  1. I’d suggest simply using the subtotal function and filtering the data using the Win/Loss column.  You get the same results and the formula is more comprehensible.

    1. @John

      That is one option.

      There are times however when you want to see the whole data table or a filtered subset and still want to produce summary reports against an unfiltered field.

  2. Is there a particular reason why you are using a comma and the unary (–) operator for the second array in the SUMPRODUCT formula?  It seems to work the same if you were to string the arrays together using the asterisk (*).  The advantage is that SUMPRODUCT treats the entire string of arrays as a single array.

  3. Is there a way to do this on a large set of data? As in ~100,000 rows? When I try I get an error because the formula becomes too long. It says the max length of a formula is 8,192 characters. Excel 2010.

  4. How do I incorporate a specific text within a cell for the second array. For instance, – -(C7:C13=”Apple”)
    when I chose a specific text the formula does not work.

    1. @RB

      I am not sure what is the issue as if I use the sample data in the post the following work fine

      Count:
      =SUMPRODUCT(SUBTOTAL(3,OFFSET(C7:C13,ROW(C7:C13)-MIN(ROW(C7:C13)),,1)), –(C7:C13=”L”))
      Sum:
      =SUMPRODUCT(SUBTOTAL(3,OFFSET(C7:C13,ROW(C7:C13)-MIN(ROW(C7:C13)),,1)),(C7:C13=”L”)*(D7:D13))

      You may want to check that there are no leading or trailing spaces in your list of Apples

      1. I should have given a better explanation. Heres my situation. I have a column with cells filled with names like Column 1, Column 2, Pier 1, Pier 2, etc. If the cell just contained Pier and searched for that it works. But because it has other characters in the cell its not recognizing the pier. So how can I extract specific characters of a string of text in this formula?

        Hopefully this was a better explanation

  5. Hello-

    This formula works pretty well for me except that it slow down excel and prevents some of my macros from working. I was wondering if there was a way to program this in VBA so that excel isn’t always trying to recalculate it. I would like to use a push of a button to get it to run then paste in a cell.

    Thanks!

  6. I am trying to sum filtered data in a column, but would want to ignore the negative values in the column. How to go about doing this?

      1. The negative values are required for reporting purposes, but their effect on the total is distorting the required output. Please advise.

  7. I have this working for counting and summing, however, I have a list and for the second array, I need a criteria. That is, I’m looking for b13:b200=”01.??.??” or =left((a1,2) or something like that. These types of criteria matches do not appear to work as I get a blank as a result.
    Thanks!

    1. @Bob

      As your formula b13:b200=”01.??.??” looks like you are trying to check the first day of the month of the range
      What about trying Day(B13:B200)=1

  8. Hai Experts,
    i understood this formula well and working fine in MS Excel 2013
    but when the same am trying to place in google Spreadsheet it shows error as
    “SUMPRODUCT has mismatched range sizes. Expected row count: 1. column count: 1. Actual row count: 2014, column count: 1.” and as a result #VALUE! Appears in cell.
    Can anyone please help me how would i get it done in Google Spread sheet
    or is there any other formula as a substitute for this.
    Thank you very much.

    1. @Vivek

      I don’t know

      I just downloaded the file and it is working fine and not showing that error

      Goto the Formulas, Calculation Options Tab and check that Calculation is set to Automatic

      What version of Excel and Windows are you using ?

  9. I know that this forum is for MS Excel, but I am trying to help someone who is working in Google Sheets. The below formula works in Excel but Google Sheets returns:
    “SUMPRODUCT has mismatched range sizes. Expected row count: 1. column count: 1. Actual row count: 39000, column count: 1.” and as a result #VALUE! Appears in cell.
    This is the same problem asked by Srichirin above. Does anyone know if there is a formula for Google Sheets that will replicate what MS Excel does?

    =SUMPRODUCT(SUBTOTAL(3,OFFSET($C$6:$C$39500,ROW($C$6:$C$39500)-MIN(ROW($C$6:$C$39500)),,1)),- -($C$6:$C$39500=H1),($D$6:$D$39500))

  10. Trying to find a SUMPRODUCT formula that counts the word Closed by date for the last 7 days in a filtered list.
    =COUNTIF(M:M,”>”&TODAY()-7) works ok for unfiltered count Column M contains Closure dates (blank if open) and Column L is Status Open or Closed

  11. I used this formula and worked like a charm! But, now I’ve been requested to use it but adding not one but two criteria in the same formula. For instance the sum I was doing added negative and positive numbers. I’ve been asked to use the exact same formula but adding that only positive numbers were considered… any idea on how to do this?

  12. Thank you so much brother literally I have been struggling since morning to get the sum of the filtered category, however, after reading your blog attentively i got my solution, so thanks a lot once again.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.