DashboardNovice
Member
I have a graph of stock prices plotted on the primary Y axis. The stock prices range from $517 to $600.96. The values on the primary Y axis range from 0 to 700. I also have volume plotted on the secondary axis with a max value of 30,000,000.
I have a check box which will allow me to display volume or not. When I uncheck it, to remove volume from the graph, the secondary Y axis still remains for some reason, but not only that, its values change. The first 5 values are all zero for some reason (lower half). The next five digits are all 1 (the upper half). It's as if Excel thinks a very small value is being plotted against the secondary Y axis. What is causing this? I would like for the secondary Y axis to disappear when volume is not being graphed.
Additionally, when I remove volume from the graph, the stocks plotted are in the $500 range (minimum Y axis value is 0, max value is 700) with a bunch of space below it going down to zero. This causes all the stock prices to be squished together. What I would like is for the minimum Y axis value to be around $500 so that the stock prices will take up more of the graph. I suspect this problem is connected somehow to the presence of the secondary axis with the values 0 and 1.
I have a check box which will allow me to display volume or not. When I uncheck it, to remove volume from the graph, the secondary Y axis still remains for some reason, but not only that, its values change. The first 5 values are all zero for some reason (lower half). The next five digits are all 1 (the upper half). It's as if Excel thinks a very small value is being plotted against the secondary Y axis. What is causing this? I would like for the secondary Y axis to disappear when volume is not being graphed.
Additionally, when I remove volume from the graph, the stocks plotted are in the $500 range (minimum Y axis value is 0, max value is 700) with a bunch of space below it going down to zero. This causes all the stock prices to be squished together. What I would like is for the minimum Y axis value to be around $500 so that the stock prices will take up more of the graph. I suspect this problem is connected somehow to the presence of the secondary axis with the values 0 and 1.