Hi,
My previous two posts were answered successfully within minutes ) so I thought I'd push my luck and throw another question out there.
Being a scientist a lot of the data that I have to analyse comes back in the form of multiple Excel 8 x 12 cell grids. There are 8 rows (A - H) and 12 columns (1 -12). Essentially this means that I have 96 data points each with a unique grid reference. For example A01, B01, D01 .........F12, G12 and H12.
Often I have to transform this grid data into a linear column to allow analysis in data analysis packages such as Spotfire. That is a single column of 96 values reading each column in turn . I currently have a vba macro installed that does this for me - but was wondering if there is perhaps a more elegant (less clunky) way of doing this transformation. For an added layer of complexity I would like to run a column alongside the 96 data points that includes the data reference point ie A01, B01, C01 etc - This might be easy enough if the 96 data points were actually in cells A01, etc of the Excel worksheet, but invariably the grid may be located anywhere within the worksheet. It would be nice to have a formula that means I can do both the transformation and the 'label' action in one command.
I hope that this is clear - please ask if further information is required.
Best of luck - Go Ninjas!
cheers
Mark
My previous two posts were answered successfully within minutes ) so I thought I'd push my luck and throw another question out there.
Being a scientist a lot of the data that I have to analyse comes back in the form of multiple Excel 8 x 12 cell grids. There are 8 rows (A - H) and 12 columns (1 -12). Essentially this means that I have 96 data points each with a unique grid reference. For example A01, B01, D01 .........F12, G12 and H12.
Often I have to transform this grid data into a linear column to allow analysis in data analysis packages such as Spotfire. That is a single column of 96 values reading each column in turn . I currently have a vba macro installed that does this for me - but was wondering if there is perhaps a more elegant (less clunky) way of doing this transformation. For an added layer of complexity I would like to run a column alongside the 96 data points that includes the data reference point ie A01, B01, C01 etc - This might be easy enough if the 96 data points were actually in cells A01, etc of the Excel worksheet, but invariably the grid may be located anywhere within the worksheet. It would be nice to have a formula that means I can do both the transformation and the 'label' action in one command.
I hope that this is clear - please ask if further information is required.
Best of luck - Go Ninjas!
cheers
Mark